How Do You Measure the Level of Automation in Decision-Making

The level of decision-making automation might range from supporting systems on the one hand to totally automated on the other. The level represents where a system is on this axis. There are numerous classifications for this. The choice will differ depending on the domain and application.

level of automation

29 March 2024 6-minute read

Variations in Classification Frameworks

There are many frameworks for classifying the degree of decision-making automation, each with its own approach, benefits, and drawbacks. The primary variations are as follows:

  • Number of levels: from no automating to full human replacement; less or more detailed breakdown of automation, as shown in Table 2.
  • Number and type of tasks: mostly information processing, decision-making, and action.
  • Task-specific levels: distinct criteria and needs for each level, such as LOAT in Table 3.
  • Ethical issues of automation: this include factors such as fairness, explainability, transparency, safety, and the preservation of human rights.
  • Decision Ladders: These are used in some categorisation systems to indicate different levels. These ladders represent levels with increasing autonomy, beginning with no automation and progressing to full automation at the top.
  • Industry-specific frameworks: There are specialised categorisation systems in some industries, such as aviation, healthcare, and manufacturing, that are suited to the unique requirements and challenges of those fields. Table 1 shows the SAE levels of driving automation [1].
Table 1. SAE levels of driving automation [1]
Level of automation Description
Level 0 No driving automation
Level 1 Driver assistance
Level 2 Partial driving automation
Level 3 Conditional driving automation
Level 4 High driving automation
Level 5 Full driving automation

Generic Level for All Tasks

Table 2 shows a highly practical classification for measuring the degree of automation [2]. This method is based on four generic tasks, with each level assigning a task or set of tasks to either the human or the computer, or both. In this classification, automated decision-making begins at level 8.

Table 2. Level of automation [2]
  Roles
Level of automation Implementing Selecting Generating Monitoring
(1) Manual control Human Human Human Human
(2) Action support Human/computer Human Human Human/computer
(3) Batch processing Human Human Human Human/computer
(4) Shared control Human/computer Human Human/computer Human/computer
(5) Decision support Computer Human Human/computer Human/computer
(6) Blended decision-making Computer Human/computer Human/computer Human/computer
(7) Rigid system Computer Human Computer Human/computer
(8) Automated decision-making Computer Computer Human/computer Human/computer
(9) Supervisory control Computer Computer Computer Human/computer
(10) Full automation Computer Computer Computer Computer

Task-Specific Levels

Assigning systems to a generic level (Table 2) is frequently challenging in practice. The Level Of Automation Taxonomy (LOAT) in Table 3 attempts to address this by defining levels per task [3].

The authors in question separate four tasks: gathering information, analysing information, selecting actions, and carrying out actions. For each task, 5 to 8 custom automation levels have been developed. These begin with a default level (0) that corresponds to manual task execution and progress to full automatic job. Level (1) presumes human input with simple external support, which is not truly automatic. At level (2), there is real automation.

Table 3. Level of automation by task (LOAT) [3, p 466]
Level Information Action
  Acquisition Analysis Selection Implementation
0 Manual Working Memory Based Human Manual
1 Artefact-Supported Artefact-Supported Artefact-Supported Artefact-Supported
2 Low-Level Automation Support Low-Level Automation Support Automated Decision Support Step-by-step Action Support
3 Medium-Level Automation Support Medium-Level Automation Support Rigid Automated Decision Support Low-Level Support
4 High-Level Automation Support High-Level Automation Support Low-Level Automatic Decision-Making High-Level Support
5 Full Automation Support Full Automation Support High-Level Automatic Decision-Making Low-Level Automation
6     Full Automated Decision-Making Medium-Level Automation
7       High-Level Automation
8       Full Automation

LOAT demonstrates that there is no such thing as a 'generic' level of automation for a system, but that it should always be evaluated on a task-by-task basis. An automated system can also support some of these four tasks, each with a varying level of automation. Finally, this system demonstrates how automation affects how humans are supported in accomplishing their tasks.

Criticism of LOAT

Aside from the disadvantage that it is difficult to classify an algorithm unambiguously using the LOAT approach, two perspectives are also absent.

For example, the function of people and computers in building an algorithm for an automated system is still absent. The person in an expert system defines the rules and steps that an algorithm employs. This can also be greatly automated by employing Artificial Intelligence (AI).

This construction of a decision-making model could be added to the classification in Table 2. This extension has two levels: modelling by humans (expert systems, level 0) or computers (AI, level 1). LOAT also disregards ethical considerations. This also makes it simple to broaden the classification. These ethical aspects have three levels: humans have an overview, human supervision, and full automation, in which human intervention play no role.

Symbio6 & Levels of Automation

The level of automation is a key criterion for describing and comparing automated decision-making algorithms. Symbio6 assists clients with choosing the most appropriate classification for their situation.

« More Decision Tasks Why and when automated decision-making »

References

[1] J3016_202104 (2021). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. SAE International.

[2] Endsley, M. R., & Kaber, D. B. (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42(3), 462-492.

[3] Save, L., Feuerberg, B., & Avia, E. (2012). Designing human-automation interaction: a new level of automation taxonomy. Proc. Human Factors of Systems and Technology, 2012.